Does China Really Dominate the World in Cellular IoT?

2023-05-02
关注

Illustration: © IoT For All

Does China dominate the world in cellular-based IoT? If figures are to be believed, China accounts for more than three-quarters of all cellular-based IoT connections. We at Transforma Insights have been doing some digging. Let’s take a look at the results.

“If figures are to be believed, China accounts for more than three-quarters of all cellular-based IoT connections.”

-Transforma Insights

China Leads in IoT Connections

In total, the three big Chinese telcos claimed almost 2.5 billion IoT connections at the end of 2022. That compares to about 707 million connections for the 35 biggest operators outside of China (Vodafone, AT&T, etc.). They probably account for 95 percent of global operator connections.

We think that figure for the three operators should be closer to 1.5 billion, allowing for differences in definition and a few other factors. But that’s still 2/3 of global cellular connections, dwarfing even the biggest groups from around the world.

IoT Revenue Is a Different Story

What about revenue? Not as impressive. Collectively the three big cellular IoT operators in China had revenue of just over USD4 billion (CNY28 billion) in 2022, up 28 percent y-o-y. Very big, but in comparison, Vodafone, Verizon, and AT&T are all north of USD1 billion each. And a few others are upwards of USD500m.

Transforma Insights

Another way to look at it is that China Mobile claims around ten times as many IoT connections as Vodafone, but only around twice as much revenue. And there’s also a debate to be had about the addressable market, but that’s for another time.

The three Chinese MNOs generate very low annual average revenue per connection, at around USD2/year. The comparable figure for the rest of the world in 2022 is around USD10/year. Overall we estimate that China generates only around 1/3 of the global IoT operator revenue.

NB-IoT: A Defining Characteristic of Chinese IoT Connectivity

The reason for Chinese leadership in connections is clear, as is the much lower revenue per connection. The large volumes of NB-IoT are dilutive to the average revenue per connection. Why has China been so aggressive in IoT connectivity? It’s largely political, with the Chinese government keen to drive the success of that particular tech, closely associated with Huawei.

The background is that NB-IoT originated from the Weightless technology developed by UK company Neul, which was acquired by Huawei. As a result, although NB-IoT is part of the 3GPP global standards for mobile communications, it is seen by the Chinese government as being politically ‘their’ technology. The government made available grants and loans for network roll-out, mandated the use of NB-IoT for certain projects, and put pressure on the operators to drive NB-IoT success.

The deployments of NB-IoT have significantly boosted connections figures and slightly driven up revenue, but anecdotal evidence seems to be that there is zero cellular network profit coming from these deployments.

But in this case, and unlike the rest of the world, profit does not seem to be the main motive. It’s also worth noting that perhaps a single development ecosystem is beneficial. Rather than having to contend with technology fragmentation, there is only a single option for low power wide area (LPWA) in China.

What benefit this might give as a short-term push will likely also be a long-term disadvantage, with other technology options being ultimately more appropriate for specific IoT applications, once the initial confusion over options is overcome.

Don’t Be Too Jealous

Operators outside of China should not be overwhelmed by jealousy at the apparent success of their Chinese counterparts. While connections are nominally very high (over three-quarters of global IoT connections if operator figures are to be believed), revenue per connection is very modest, meaning that the IoT opportunity in North America and Europe are each almost comparable with that of China.

If you are interested in the growth of the global IoT market and the opportunity over the next 10 years, watch the webinar ‘Are We Nearly There Yet?: Annual Update On Transforma Insights’ IoT Market Forecasts’ to learn about which applications and verticals will dominate in future, which technologies will be used, which countries will see the biggest growth, and what is the revenue opportunity.

Tweet

Share

Share

Email

  • Cellular
  • Connectivity
  • IoT Platforms
  • NB-IoT

  • Cellular
  • Connectivity
  • IoT Platforms
  • NB-IoT

  • en
您觉得本篇内容如何
评分

相关产品

EN 650 & EN 650.3 观察窗

EN 650.3 version is for use with fluids containing alcohol.

Acromag 966EN 温度信号调节器

这些模块为多达6个输入通道提供了一个独立的以太网接口。多量程输入接收来自各种传感器和设备的信号。高分辨率,低噪音,A/D转换器提供高精度和可靠性。三路隔离进一步提高了系统性能。,两种以太网协议可用。选择Ethernet Modbus TCP\/IP或Ethernet\/IP。,i2o功能仅在6通道以太网Modbus TCP\/IP模块上可用。,功能

雷克兰 EN15F 其他

品牌;雷克兰 型号; EN15F 功能;防化学 名称;防化手套

Honeywell USA CSLA2EN 电流传感器

CSLA系列感应模拟电流传感器集成了SS490系列线性霍尔效应传感器集成电路。该传感元件组装在印刷电路板安装外壳中。这种住房有四种配置。正常安装是用0.375英寸4-40螺钉和方螺母(没有提供)插入外壳或6-20自攻螺钉。所述传感器、磁通收集器和壳体的组合包括所述支架组件。这些传感器是比例测量的。

TMP Pro Distribution C012EN RF 音频麦克风

C012E射频从上到下由实心黄铜制成,非常适合于要求音质的极端环境,具有非常坚固的外壳。内置的幻像电源模块具有完全的射频保护,以防止在800 Mhz-1.2 Ghz频段工作的GSM设备的干扰。极性模式:心形频率响应:50赫兹-18千赫灵敏度:-47dB+\/-3dB@1千赫

ValueTronics DLRO200-EN 毫欧表

"The DLRO200-EN ducter ohmmeter is a dlro from Megger."

评论

您需要登录才可以回复|注册

提交评论

广告

iotforall

这家伙很懒,什么描述也没留下

关注

点击进入下一篇

用eSIM解决冷链连接的挑战

提取码
复制提取码
点击跳转至百度网盘