Choosing IoT LTE Standards: Cat 1 and Cat 1bis Vs. NB-IoT and LTE-M

2022-12-31
关注

Cat 1 and Cat 1bis Vs. NB-IoT and LTE-M
Illustration: © IoT For All

Choosing LTE Standards

When you’re designing a cellular IoT product, you must plan for connectivity from the very start. Immediately, you’re faced with a tough choice: choosing LTE standards. Which 4G LTE (or 5G NR) standard should you design for? The answer will dictate the path of your connectivity technology, from which chipsets and modules to use to the mobile network carriers you work with. 

'When you’re designing a cellular IoT product, you must plan for connectivity from the very start. Immediately, you’re faced with a tough choice: Which 4G LTE (or 5G NR) standard should you design for?' -Sequans CommunicationsClick To Tweet

If you’re designing for massive IoT deployments—anything from smart utility meters to wearable consumer devices to industrial autonomous vehicles—LTE cellular networks give you four choices. (These are likely to change as we approach 2030, as 4G LTE networks give way to 5G New Radio [NR]…but we’ll discuss that transition, and its implications for device manufacturers, in another article.) For now, keep reading for tips on which LTE standard will provide the most value for your products, including common use cases for each.

The 4 LTE Standards for Massive IoT   

Today’s massive IoT connectivity ecosystem offers these LTE standards, each of which is appropriate for a different set of scenarios. Here are today’s choices, along with a few standard applications for each: 

1. LTE Cat 1 

Long-term evolution (LTE) networks specify size limits for data as it travels across cellular networks. In 2008, standardization authority 3GPP published Release 8, which defined specifications for user equipment (UE) along five categories. 

The first of these categories—LTE Cat 1—defines a maximum data transfer rate of five megabytes per second for uploads (5 Mbps UL), and 10 Mbps for downloads (10 Mbps DL). That made LTE Cat 1 the first standard designed specifically for IoT, which typically demands lower data rates than, say, streaming Netflix on your phone. 

You might think a standard that first appeared in 2008 is outdated. In fact, the opposite is true: Because LTE Cat 1 is a mature technology, it’s available essentially everywhere, and it provides enough data throughput to support a wide variety of use cases. That’s not always the case, as we’ll discuss in our coverage of NB-IoT and Cat-M, items three and four on this list.         

2. LTE Cat 1bis

An LTE Cat 1 module uses two antennas. For device manufacturers looking to save space or cut costs, one antenna may be more appropriate. Enter LTE Cat 1bis, which is essentially a version of the LTE Cat 1 standard (5 Mbps UL and 10 Mbps DL) on single-antenna hardware.

A Cat 1bis module may lose some coverage compared to its dual-antennaed cousin, but the difference rarely translates to the user’s experience. When Sequans—producers of the Calliope chipset, the first LTE platform optimized for Cat 1—conducted field tests, they found that the single antenna lost only a few decibels of coverage compared to a dual-antenna Cat 1 module and that the advanced signal processing techniques of the platform can mitigate this loss. 

Furthermore, cellular networks are often uplink limited, resulting in customers experiencing little to no difference between the use of one or two antennas, as reported by millions of customers using only one antenna in real-world deployments. This shows the relevance of a Cat 1bis optimized platform providing cost improvements while providing nearly equivalent Cat 1 performance. Finally, it is important to stress that any Cat 1 network can enable Cat 1bis devices without any network change or upgrade.

All that makes LTE Cat 1bis an excellent choice for small devices with moderate data requirements, including voice or video data.

Common IoT Use Cases for LTE Cat 1 and LTE Cat 1bis

Because they use essentially the same baseline specification, LTE Cat 1 and Cat 1bis cover the same types of applications. The difference is whether a single-antenna design will fit your product better, due to savings in space or cost. (The benefits will vary from project to project, which is why it’s helpful to choose a chip/module provider with the expertise to help guide you to your ideal technology). Also, when using a new generation dedicated Cat 1bis module, one can benefit from the most optimized RF and power consumption performance, along with additional features like integrated GNSS or integrated eSIM.

These standards offer near-universal coverage, along with higher data limits than NB-IoT or LTE-M. That makes them particularly flexible for devices with varying data throughput needs and/or multinational deployments. Common use cases for LTE Cat 1 include: 

  • IoT retail kiosks
  • In-car hotspots
  • Gaming devices
  • SmartGrid products
  • Home security systems
  • Wearable cameras
  • Point-of-Sales terminals
  • Health monitors
  • Smart watches 

For lower data needs, however, 3GPP does offer two LTE standards designed specifically for massive IoT projects: NB-IoT and LTE-M. 

3. NB-IoT 

By 2015, the IoT industry was looking for lower-cost chipsets and modules. Many IoT systems didn’t need anywhere close to 5 Mbps UL or 10 Mbps DL data rates. That need led to the development of two IoT standards for LPWANs, as defined in 3GPP’s Release 13. 

The Narrow Band Internet of Things (NB-IoT) standard was designed specifically for IoT devices with low data requirements. It limits data rates to around 160 kilobytes per second (kbps) in 3GPP Release 14. If you don’t need to move much data, NB-IoT’s low data rates can help optimize your IoT products for cost, power usage, and network capacity—provided your market carries NB-IoT coverage.

Both NB-IoT and LTE-M require upgrades to cellular networks, which has led to non-uniform deployment, globally. In China, India, and parts of Europe, NB-IoT is widely available.

Common IoT Use Cases for NB-IoT

Because NB-IoT offers the lowest data limit among all four LTE standards, use cases are limited to the sorts of sensors that transmit very small packets. These often include: 

  • Smart smoke detectors
  • Parking control systems
  • Agricultural monitoring products
  • Smart building applications (HVAC and lighting control, for instance) 
  • Pollution monitoring systems
  • Industrial IoT sensors
  • Part of the metering applications (notably gas and water)

4. LTE-M

The LTE-M standard sits somewhere between NB-IoT and Cat 1 in terms of data limits; it allows up to 1.1 Mbps of data to flow. Other than that, it’s quite similar to NB-IoT: optimized for cost, power usage, and network capacity for massive IoT systems.

However, some regions of the world updated their cellular infrastructure for NB-IoT, not LTE-M, so it’s not available everywhere. In North America, Japan, and—again—parts of Europe, LTE-M is widely and functionally deployed, but it’s not available at all in China or India.

As we mentioned, Cat 1 is available on virtually every cellular network in the world. If you serve global markets—and you don’t want the inventory headache of managing multiple SKUs for the same product—Cat 1 is probably your best choice. But if your data needs fall between the NB-IoT and the Cat 1 limits, and your markets have coverage, LTE-M can offer a great combination of benefits in massive IoT deployments.

Common IoT Use Cases for LTE-M

Where it’s available, LTE-M is a popular standard for smart city applications, which typically require low latency, but don’t have high data needs. This standard is also used for light asset tracking and monitoring, plus some smart devices. Sample use cases for LTE-M connectivity include: 

  • Fleet trackers
  • Asset trackers
  • Utility meters (gas, electricity, water, etc.) 
  • Mobile personal emergency response systems (mPERS) 

There’s also a lot of overlap between the use cases for LTE-M and Cat 1. The LTE-M standard is also found in connected healthcare devices, smart watches, and point-of-sales terminals, for instance.

This area of commonality between LTE-M and Cat 1 leads to another question: How do you determine which LTE standard is right for your product or project? 

5 Questions to Help Identify the Right LTE Standard

Every massive IoT project is different, and any of these four LTE standards may provide the most benefits for yours. To make the right decision, start by answering these five questions:

  1. What are your goals for cellular connectivity? 

Start by identifying your key performance indicators (KPIs). What do you need the cellular connection to do? Must it be optimized for higher data throughput, lower power usage, minimal latency, reliable uptime, or some combination of these factors? Once you set your goals, you can start making a plan to meet them—but always keep the goalpost in mind. 

  1. How much are you willing to spend? 

Clearly, limiting costs is essential to any product’s development. But to get all the features you want into an IoT device, you may need to adjust your cost targets. When pricing out your cellular connectivity, consider both the cost of the module and the ongoing cost of your data plan. 

  1. What is your project timeline? 

Adding cellular connectivity to your products requires assembly, testing, and relationships with MNOs, and your choice of standard can affect these timelines. If you need to ship your product sooner rather than later, that could change your choice of cellular technology.

  1. Where do you plan to deploy your IoT devices? 

As noted above, NB-IoT and LTE-M aren’t available everywhere in the world, although they are very mature in some regions, and one can consider using a dual-mode LTE-M/NB-IoT solution. If you cover a global market, you have two choices: You can either manage multiple SKUs for each region (and its corresponding LTE standard), or you can go with the global coverage of Cat 1 or Cat 1bis.

  1. How much future-proofing do you need? 

Be realistic about your product’s lifespan. If you need it to work for 20 years and are not expecting to launch before 2027, for instance, you may need to wait for the coming switch to 5G NR networks. (We expect to see that transition begin around the late middle of the 2020s.) That said, we expect LTE-M and NB-IoT to coexist with 5G NR at least through 2035, and private LTE operators will keep it way beyond 2040—the point being, knowing how long your product needs to work in the field can help you choose the right cellular standard.

If all this seems confusing, that’s because it is! The most helpful tip we can offer is to source your chipsets and modules from a provider that backs up their products with expert consultation. Chipset producers are the experts in cellular connectivity; work with them to make the best choice for your massive IoT products. 

Tweet

Share

Share

Email

  • Connectivity
  • Cellular
  • Internet of Things

  • Connectivity
  • Cellular
  • Internet of Things

参考译文
选择IoT LTE标准:Cat 1和Cat 1bis Vs. NB-IoT和LTE- m
当你在设计蜂窝物联网产品时,你必须从一开始就计划连接。你马上就面临一个艰难的选择:选择LTE标准。你应该为哪种4G LTE(或5G NR)标准设计?答案将决定你的连接技术的发展路径,从使用哪些芯片组和模块到与你合作的移动网络运营商。如果您正在为大规模物联网部署进行设计——从智能公用电表到可穿戴消费设备再到工业自动驾驶汽车——lte蜂窝网络为您提供了四种选择。(随着我们接近2030年,4G LTE网络让位于5G新无线电(NR),这些情况可能会发生变化……但我们将在另一篇文章中讨论这种转变,以及它对设备制造商的影响。)目前,请继续阅读有关哪种LTE标准将为您的产品提供最大价值的提示,包括每种标准的常见用例。如今大规模的物联网连接生态系统提供了这些LTE标准,每种标准都适用于不同的场景。以下是目前的选择,以及针对每种技术的一些标准应用:长期演进(LTE)网络规定了数据在蜂窝网络中传输时的大小限制。2008年,标准化权威机构3GPP发布了第8版,它定义了用户设备(UE)的五个类别的规范。这些类别中的第一个- lte Cat 1 -定义了上传的最大数据传输速率为5mb / s (5mbps UL),下载的最大数据传输速率为10mbps (10mbps DL)。这使得LTE Cat 1成为第一个专门为物联网设计的标准,物联网通常要求比在手机上播放Netflix流媒体更低的数据速率。你可能认为2008年首次出现的标准已经过时了。事实上,事实恰恰相反:因为LTE Cat 1是一项成熟的技术,基本上在任何地方都可以使用,而且它提供了足够的数据吞吐量来支持各种各样的用例。但情况并非总是如此,正如我们将在关于NB-IoT和Cat-M的报道中讨论的那样,这是本列表中的第三项和第四项。LTE Cat 1模块使用两根天线。对于希望节省空间或降低成本的设备制造商来说,一根天线可能更合适。进入LTE Cat 1bis,它本质上是LTE Cat 1标准的一个版本(5 Mbps UL和10 Mbps DL)在单天线硬件上。与双天线相比,Cat 1bis模块可能会失去一些覆盖范围,但这种差异很少转化为用户体验。当sequans公司生产的Calliope芯片组(首款针对Cat 1优化的LTE平台)进行现场测试时,他们发现,与双天线Cat 1模块相比,单天线的覆盖范围仅损失了几分贝,而该平台的先进信号处理技术可以减轻这种损失。此外,蜂窝网络的上行链路通常是有限的,导致客户在使用一个或两个天线之间体验到很少或没有区别,正如数百万客户在实际部署中只使用一个天线所报告的那样。这表明了Cat 1bis优化平台的相关性,在提供几乎相同的Cat 1性能的同时,还可以提供成本方面的改进。最后,需要强调的是,任何Cat 1网络都可以启用Cat 1bis设备,而无需任何网络更改或升级。所有这些使得LTE Cat 1bis成为对数据需求适中的小型设备(包括语音或视频数据)的绝佳选择。 由于它们使用基本相同的基准规范,LTE Cat 1和Cat 1bis涵盖了相同类型的应用。区别在于单天线设计是否更适合你的产品,因为它可以节省空间或成本。(每个项目的好处各不相同,这就是为什么选择一个具有专业知识的芯片/模块提供商是有帮助的,可以帮助指导您实现理想的技术)。此外,当使用新一代专用Cat 1bis模块时,可以受益于最优化的RF和功耗性能,以及集成GNSS或集成eSIM等附加功能。这些标准提供了近乎普遍的覆盖,以及比NB-IoT或LTE-M更高的数据限制。这使得它们对于具有不同数据吞吐量需求和/或跨国部署的设备特别灵活。然而,为了更低的数据需求,3GPP确实提供了两种专门为大型物联网项目设计的LTE标准:NB-IoT和LTE- m。到2015年,物联网行业正在寻找低成本的芯片组和模块。许多物联网系统不需要接近5mbps UL或10mbps DL的数据速率。这一需求导致了针对lpwan的两个物联网标准的开发,如3GPP第13版所定义的那样。窄带物联网(NB-IoT)标准是专门为低数据需求的物联网设备设计的。在3GPP Release 14中,它将数据速率限制在大约160千字节每秒(kbps)。如果您不需要移动大量数据,NB-IoT的低数据速率可以帮助优化您的IoT产品的成本、功耗和网络容量,前提是您的市场包含NB-IoT覆盖。NB-IoT和LTE-M都需要升级蜂窝网络,这导致全球部署不统一。在中国、印度和欧洲部分地区,NB-IoT已广泛应用。由于NB-IoT在所有四个LTE标准中提供了最低的数据限制,因此用例仅限于传输非常小的数据包的传感器类型。这些通常包括:LTE-M标准在数据限制方面介于NB-IoT和Cat 1之间;它允许高达1.1 Mbps的数据流。除此之外,它与NB-IoT非常相似:针对大规模物联网系统的成本、功耗和网络容量进行了优化。然而,世界上一些地区更新了NB-IoT的蜂窝基础设施,而不是LTE-M,所以并不是所有地方都可以使用。在北美、日本,以及欧洲的部分地区,LTE-M已经广泛应用,但在中国或印度根本无法使用。正如我们提到的,Cat 1在世界上几乎每个蜂窝网络上都可用。如果您服务于全球市场,并且您不希望为同一产品管理多个sku而造成令人头痛的库存问题,那么cat 1可能是您的最佳选择。但是,如果您的数据需求介于NB-IoT和Cat 1限制之间,并且您的市场有覆盖范围,那么LTE-M可以在大规模物联网部署中提供巨大的优势组合。在可用的地方,LTE-M是智能城市应用程序的流行标准,这些应用程序通常要求低延迟,但对数据的需求不高。该标准还用于轻资产跟踪和监控,以及一些智能设备。LTE-M连接的示例用例包括:LTE-M和Cat 1的用例之间也有很多重叠。LTE-M标准还应用于连接的医疗保健设备、智能手表和销售点终端等。LTE- m和Cat 1之间的这一共同点引出了另一个问题:如何确定哪种LTE标准适合您的产品或项目?每个大型物联网项目都是不同的,这四种LTE标准中的任何一种都可能为您提供最大的好处。要做出正确的决定,首先回答以下五个问题: 从确定关键绩效指标(kpi)开始。你需要手机连接做什么?必须为更高的数据吞吐量、更低的功耗、最小的延迟、可靠的正常运行时间或这些因素的某些组合进行优化吗?一旦你设定了目标,你就可以开始制定计划来实现它们——但要时刻牢记目标。显然,限制成本对任何产品的开发都是至关重要的。但是为了让物联网设备具备你想要的所有功能,你可能需要调整你的成本目标。在定价蜂窝网络连接时,要同时考虑模块的成本和数据计划的持续成本。将蜂窝连接添加到您的产品中需要组装、测试以及与MNOs的关系,而您选择的标准会影响这些时间线。如果你需要尽早发布你的产品,这可能会改变你对蜂窝技术的选择。如上所述,虽然NB-IoT和LTE-M在某些地区非常成熟,但并不是世界各地都可以使用,可以考虑使用双模LTE-M/NB-IoT解决方案。如果您覆盖全球市场,您有两个选择:您可以为每个地区管理多个sku(及其相应的LTE标准),或者您可以使用Cat 1或Cat 1bis的全球覆盖。对产品的寿命要现实一点。例如,如果你需要它工作20年,并且不希望在2027年之前推出,你可能需要等待即将到来的5G NR网络切换。(我们预计这种转变将在21世纪20年代中期左右开始。)也就是说,我们预计LTE- m和NB-IoT至少到2035年才能与5G NR共存,而私人LTE运营商将在2040年之后继续保持这种状态——关键是,了解您的产品需要在现场工作多长时间可以帮助您选择正确的蜂窝标准。如果这一切看起来令人困惑,那是因为它是!我们能提供的最有帮助的建议是,从供应商那里采购芯片组和模块,这些供应商通过专家咨询来备份他们的产品。芯片组生产商是蜂窝连接领域的专家;与他们合作,为您的大型物联网产品做出最佳选择。
  • en
您觉得本篇内容如何
评分

相关产品

EN 650 & EN 650.3 观察窗

EN 650.3 version is for use with fluids containing alcohol.

Acromag 966EN 温度信号调节器

这些模块为多达6个输入通道提供了一个独立的以太网接口。多量程输入接收来自各种传感器和设备的信号。高分辨率,低噪音,A/D转换器提供高精度和可靠性。三路隔离进一步提高了系统性能。,两种以太网协议可用。选择Ethernet Modbus TCP\/IP或Ethernet\/IP。,i2o功能仅在6通道以太网Modbus TCP\/IP模块上可用。,功能

雷克兰 EN15F 其他

品牌;雷克兰 型号; EN15F 功能;防化学 名称;防化手套

Honeywell USA CSLA2EN 电流传感器

CSLA系列感应模拟电流传感器集成了SS490系列线性霍尔效应传感器集成电路。该传感元件组装在印刷电路板安装外壳中。这种住房有四种配置。正常安装是用0.375英寸4-40螺钉和方螺母(没有提供)插入外壳或6-20自攻螺钉。所述传感器、磁通收集器和壳体的组合包括所述支架组件。这些传感器是比例测量的。

TMP Pro Distribution C012EN RF 音频麦克风

C012E射频从上到下由实心黄铜制成,非常适合于要求音质的极端环境,具有非常坚固的外壳。内置的幻像电源模块具有完全的射频保护,以防止在800 Mhz-1.2 Ghz频段工作的GSM设备的干扰。极性模式:心形频率响应:50赫兹-18千赫灵敏度:-47dB+\/-3dB@1千赫

ValueTronics DLRO200-EN 毫欧表

"The DLRO200-EN ducter ohmmeter is a dlro from Megger."

Minco AH439S1N10EN 温湿度变送器

Minco空间湿度探测器组件具有温度补偿功能,结构紧凑,重量轻。它们是为直接安装在建筑内墙上而设计的。他们的特点是集成电路传感器与稳定的聚合物元件,是由烧结不锈钢过滤器封装,加上先进的微处理器,以提供准确和可重复的测量。温度输出是可选的。,用于需要:

评论

您需要登录才可以回复|注册

提交评论

提取码
复制提取码
点击跳转至百度网盘